[Tinymux] [lit()] Question

[Id10t Error]

Well, the actual idea is that I want it to pass an unparsed version of %0 to an attribute. IE: I want the %R to stay %R and not be translated by the code into a return carriage. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Sean Hunter 
  To: tinymux at tinymux.org 
  Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 2:05 AM
  Subject: Re: [Tinymux] [lit()] Question


  If you use @addcommand on a command it will keep the arguments from being evaluated. Honestly I think this should be a switch on @addcommand, since it's useful to move stuff out of the master room to speed things up.

  Also, I think this is a bug, but if you have a softcode command like $'*:<commands> on an object in the master room, it'll work fine, but if you @addcommand it and remove it from the master room, it doesn't recognize it when you use it like '<text> but it'll work as ' <text> if the space is there.

  -- Sean

  Stephen Dennis wrote: 
At least one codebase has a no_parse attribute flag which disables the
usual evaluation before command matching.  MUX currently does not
support that attribute flag.

Someone else may have a few ideas or guidance related to this, but I'm
drawing a blank this morning.

Brazil
_______________________________________________
Tinymux mailing list
Tinymux at tinymux.org
http://www.tinymux.org/mailman/listinfo/tinymux


  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Tinymux mailing list
  Tinymux at tinymux.org
  http://www.tinymux.org/mailman/listinfo/tinymux
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.mushpark.com/pipermail/tinymux/attachments/20041126/6dd7e127/attachment.html