[Tinymux] MUX and Functions
Sandi Fallon
sandif at townisp.com
Tue Mar 22 09:53:23 EST 2005
Hi Mark!
With tongue firmly in cheek, I'm going to suggest MUX is too lazy,
rather than "too aggressive" in checking for functions. :)
As Brazil intimated, it only looked for a function with a space in
the name because you told it to. :)
I agree with you about spitting out the refuse after an error. A bit
inelegant, perhaps, but it sure made debugging quick and easy. I vote
for returning to that behavior, and removing all the error messages.
It might be frowned on by those with fresh CS degrees, but mushcode
is for newbies.
Sandi
More information about the Tinymux
mailing list