[Tinymux] @hook/permit
T SS
thesilversamurai at hotmail.com
Tue Nov 29 20:39:34 EST 2005
>From: Robby Griffin <rmg at terc.edu>
>Reply-To: tinymux at tinymux.org
>To: tinymux at tinymux.org
>Subject: Re: [Tinymux] @hook/permit
>Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 11:27:20 -0500
>
>On Nov 29, 2005, at 08:35, T SS wrote:
>>@hook/permit move
>>@hook: New mask for 'goto' -> permit
>>@hook/permit goto
>>@hook: New mask for 'goto' -> permit
>
>It's trying to tell you that the internal name of the command is 'goto' for
>all practical purposes. You'll find that 'move' is an alias, I believe.
>
>>P_MOVE: [not(hasflag(%#,dead))]
>
>Yeah, so, not going to do much good under the wrong name.
Er, no. Even setting it as @hook/permit move it still doesn't work.
The goto part was just an attempt to cover all bases. And if it did work
that way, it still should have invoked the object I believe? But move/goto
doesn't seem to do that. Which is why I suggested it was an implimentation
of move issue.
Thanks for the response,
K.
More information about the Tinymux
mailing list