[Tinymux] More trouble with Reality Levels

[Stephen Dennis]

On 10/25/05, Golden Age <golden at silverscreen.betterbox.net> wrote:
>
> Just as a side note, I'm not sure that the evaluation when compiled
> without reality levels is correct either. I expected it to return:
> name(me)=Gold Digger num(me)=#3

 The evaluation without reality levels is correct. Evaluating
'name(me)=[name(me)] num(me)=[num(me)]' turns into 'Gold Digger=....'
because the first function evaluates with requiring brackets. It's for the
same reason that 'add(2,2)' gives 4 instead of requiring '[add(2,2)]'.
 Thanks for looking critically at Reality Levels. Eventually, I'm sure the
group responsible for reality levels in TinyMUX will make another patch.
 Brazil
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.tinymux.org/pipermail/tinymux/attachments/20051027/23977780/attachment.html